Cover Knot35
News

Unveiling the Oathbreaker Ban List: Cards That Are Not to Be Trusted

Introduction to the Oathbreaker Ban List


Oathbreaker Ban List

For those who enjoy playing Magic: The Gathering, the game offers a variety of formats to play in. One of the newer formats that has gained popularity is Oathbreaker. It is a multiplayer format, played with 60-card decks and a sideboard of fifteen cards. The format is typically played with four players, but it can accommodate up to six. In the Oathbreaker format, players choose a planeswalker as their commander and an instant or sorcery card as their “Signature Spell.” This spell is always accessible to them during the game, even if it is in the deck or sideboard.

As with any format, the Oathbreaker format has a ban list. This ban list consists of cards that are deemed too powerful, disruptive, or unfun for the format. The intent of the ban list is to create a balanced and enjoyable environment for players to engage in exciting gameplay. The Oathbreaker ban list is updated frequently to ensure that the format remains balanced and fair for all players.

The first Oathbreaker ban list was released in 2019 when the format was still relatively new. At that time, only a handful of cards were banned. As the format grew in popularity, more cards needed to be added to the ban list to maintain a healthy and fun format.

Currently, there are nineteen cards on the Oathbreaker ban list. These cards are Teferi, Time Raveler, Narset, Parter of Veils, Karn, the Great Creator, Deafening Silence, Lavinia, Azorius Renegade, Primeval Titan, Urza, Lord High Artificer, Iona, Shield of Emeria, Paradox Engine, Daretti, Scrap Savant, Balance, Griselbrand, Worldfire, Emrakul, the Promised End, Oko, Thief of Crowns, and Leovold, Emissary of Trest.

The cards on the ban list cover a range of formats, including Standard, Modern, and Commander. Some of the banned cards are too powerful in the Oathbreaker format and can end games too quickly. Others can cause too much disruption and slow down the pace of the game. The ban list is constantly monitored, and more cards can be added or removed as necessary.

While the Oathbreaker ban list may seem strict, it is necessary to ensure that the format remains balanced and fair. A banlist is a common practice in most Magic: The Gathering formats, and it helps players design decks that can achieve creative and exciting gameplay. Following the ban list can also prevent problems in a playgroup. You don’t want to show up to a casual Oathbreaker night with a banned card in your deck, causing frustration among other players.

In conclusion, the Oathbreaker ban list plays a critical role in ensuring a balanced, healthy, and enjoyable format for Magic: The Gathering players. With the ongoing updates and revisions to the list, the format remains fresh and fun. By following the ban list, players can create exciting, engaging decks and play with others in a friendly and welcoming environment.

Top Cards Banned in Oathbreaker


Karn and Paradox Engine

Oathbreaker is a fast-paced, unique and exciting format of Magic: The Gathering. Since its inception, it has already garnered a significant number of fans who have grown to love the new dynamic gameplay and the brewing possibilities that it brings. However, like in any other format, it has its fair share of banned cards that limit the strategies and enjoyable experience of the format. Here are the top two cards banned in Oathbreaker with detailed explanations of why they had to face such a restriction.

Karn, The Great Creator and Paradox Engine


Karn and Paradox Engine

Karn, The Great Creator and Paradox Engine on the face of it may not seem like a match made in Oathbreaker heaven, but that did not stop them from creating one of the most oppressive and unbeatable decks the format has ever seen- Sai Combo. Sai Combo deck duo’s strength comes from how each card enables the other to create a self-fulfilling loop that is extremely hard to stop.

On one side of the duo, Karn, the Great Creator, with his powerful effect, was used to turn every artifact that he could into creatures with his minus two loyalty ability. The resulting artifact creatures would then proceed to keep tapping and untapping with ease.

On the other side, the infamous combo piece, Paradox Engine, took to the stage- Karn’s best friend, and the most potent piece for the build of Sai Combo’s oppressive strategy. Paradox Engine’s effect is so powerful that it enables players to untap any number of artifacts after casting a spell, essentially allowing for infinite loops that generate an overwhelming amount of mana and card advantage.

The combination of these two cards enables infinite loops that bypasses most of what the Oathbreaker format has precautioned against, such as limiting control decks, combo decks, or overbearing board states. It also hinders other fair strategies in the format from thriving, reducing the diversity and gameplay of the format.

Apart from the oppressive Sai combo deck, it also greatly hinders strategy and brewing creativity possibilities for other decks that include Karn, the Great Creator and Paradox Engine.

In conclusion, Karn, The Great Creator, and Paradox engine banned in the oathbreaker format is necessary to keep the format fresh and engaging regarding gameplay and creativity. Though individually both cards aren’t overpowered, these two in combination pose a devastating threat, one that seems impossible to keep in check.

Controversial Cards on the Oathbreaker Ban List


Magic the Gathering cards

Throughout the history of Magic: The Gathering, there have been countless cards that have caused controversy and debate within the community. Some of these cards have been banned in certain formats, while others have been allowed to remain legal despite their perceived power level. The Oathbreaker format is no exception, with a number of cards being deemed too powerful or disruptive to be included in decks. Here are three notable examples of controversial cards on the Oathbreaker ban list:

1. Sol Ring

Sol Ring

Sol Ring is a classic Magic card that has been printed in numerous sets, and is a staple in many Commander decks. The card provides two colorless mana for only one mana cost, making it an incredibly efficient way to ramp up quickly in the early game. However, this efficiency comes at a cost, as it creates a power imbalance between players who have access to the card and those who don’t. In the Oathbreaker format, where games are typically faster-paced than Commander, the inclusion of Sol Ring could lead to an even greater advantage for the player who draws it, potentially leading to a less enjoyable game experience for other players.

2. Narset, Parter of Veils

Narset, Parter of Veils

Narset, Parter of Veils is a planeswalker from the War of the Spark set, and has quickly become a popular card in a variety of formats. Her static ability prevents opponents from drawing more than one card each turn, effectively shutting down any decks that rely on drawing large numbers of cards. In the Oathbreaker format, where decks tend to be smaller and more focused than in other formats, Narset’s ability can be even more devastating, as it can cut off a player’s access to crucial cards and strategies. While some players argue that Narset is not as overpowered as other cards on the ban list, her ability to completely shut down certain decks has made her a controversial inclusion.

3. Field of the Dead

Field of the Dead card

Field of the Dead is a land card from the Core Set 2020, and has quickly become a popular inclusion in a variety of decks. The card’s ability triggers whenever a player has seven or more different lands with different names on the battlefield, creating a 2/2 black Zombie creature token. In a format like Oathbreaker, where games tend to be shorter and more focused, Field of the Dead can quickly overwhelm opponents with an army of Zombie tokens. Some players argue that the card’s power level is not high enough to justify a ban, while others point out that its inclusion can lead to repetitive and uninteresting game states.

Ultimately, the decision to include or ban any card in the Oathbreaker format is up to individual playgroups and tournament organizers. While some cards may be widely regarded as too powerful or disruptive, others may be seen as necessary pieces of certain strategies or archetypes. As with any debate within the Magic community, it’s important to approach these issues with an open mind and a willingness to consider different viewpoints.

Playing without Banned Cards in Oathbreaker


Playing without Banned Cards in Oathbreaker

If you want to play Oathbreaker, but don’t like the idea of playing with certain banned cards, you can still play the game. You’ll need to put some extra effort into creating a deck that can compete with the more powerful decks running banned cards, but it’s definitely possible to build a successful deck without banned cards.

One way to go is to focus on developing a strategy that can take down an opponent’s powerful deck before they can get all of their powerful cards out onto the board. This can be done by including cards that disrupt your opponent’s gameplan, prevent them from playing their most important cards, or deal with their key threats quickly and efficiently. For example, you could build a deck that relies heavily on removal spells and direct damage spells to take out your opponent’s planeswalkers and creatures, while also including cards that can destroy artifacts and enchantments and prevent your opponent from using their most powerful cards.

Another approach is to focus on building a deck that can win quickly and decisively, without relying on any particular card or combo. This may mean including cards that are cheap and efficient, like a swarm of low-cost creatures that can quickly overwhelm your opponent, or cards that scale in power as the game goes on, like a group of planeswalkers that can slowly build up their abilities over time.

One important thing to keep in mind when building a deck without any banned cards is that you’ll need to be adaptable. Your deck may not be as powerful or consistent as some of the banned cards out there, so you’ll need to be able to shift your strategy and adjust your gameplan on the fly to adapt to what your opponent is doing. This may mean cutting back on cards that aren’t working the way you want them to, or swapping out certain cards for others that might be more effective in specific matchups.

Overall, playing without banned cards in Oathbreaker may be more challenging than building a deck that includes them, but it can also be more rewarding. You’ll have the satisfaction of knowing that you’re winning because of your skill and strategy, rather than just relying on powerful cards that have been deemed too good for the format. And who knows? You may just come up with a winning deck that proves that you don’t need any banned cards to be a true master of Oathbreaker.

Future Outlook for the Oathbreaker Ban List


Oathbreaker Ban List

The Oathbreaker Ban List has been a point of discussion amongst players of the popular Magic: The Gathering spinoff format. With certain cards proving to be problematic or overpowered, there has been a need to create a list of cards that are banned in order to maintain a fair and balanced playing field. However, as the game and the format evolve, there are some cards that may no longer need to be on the ban list. We’ll take a closer look at the current ban list and predict the future outlook for it.

The Current Ban List

The Oathbreaker format currently has a total of eight (8) cards on the ban list. These are:

  • Balance
  • Biorhythm
  • Gifts Ungiven
  • Grindstone
  • Painter’s Servant
  • Sensai’s Divining Top
  • Sway of the Stars
  • Yawgmoth’s Bargain

These cards have been deemed too powerful or problematic for the format and have been banned to prevent them from being used. Some of them are also banned in other Magic: The Gathering formats for similar reasons. However, as the game and the format evolve, there may be some cards that can be removed from this list.

Potential Changes to the Ban List

One of the goals of the Oathbreaker Ban List is to maintain a fair and balanced playing field for all players. As such, the ban list is constantly being evaluated and adjusted to ensure that this goal is achieved. There are a few cards on the ban list that may be candidates for removal:

  1. Balanced: This card has been controversial since its inception. However, recent cards like Teferi’s Protection and Heroic Intervention have been released, making Balance less potent in the current meta. This may lead to the card being taken off the ban list in the future.
  2. Gifts Ungiven: This card has been on the ban list for a long time, but many players believe it may be safe to unban it. The reasoning is that in the current meta, there are many ways to deal with graveyard recursion, making it less of a problem than it was before.
  3. Grindstone: This card was banned due to its powerful combo potential, but recent cards like Emry, Lurker of the Loch have made the combo less potent. As such, Grindstone may be considered for removal from the ban list in the future.

Conclusion

The Oathbreaker Ban List exists to maintain the balance and fairness of the format. As such, it is constantly being evaluated and adjusted to ensure that this goal is achieved. With the release of new cards and the evolution of the meta, certain cards may no longer be as problematic as they once were. It is important for players to stay informed about these changes to ensure that their decks are legal and that they are up to date with the current state of the format.

Leave Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *